<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Elizabeth Edwards Resign, Too?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:21:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-147352</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-147352</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I happened to be looking around for articles on John Edwards and Elizabeth Edwards and I happened to find your post.  I can&#039;t believe this has already been a couple of years ago.  And then all of that crap came out this year about John Edwards and his affair.  Just seems like Edwards are having a hard time lately.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happened to be looking around for articles on John Edwards and Elizabeth Edwards and I happened to find your post.  I can&#8217;t believe this has already been a couple of years ago.  And then all of that crap came out this year about John Edwards and his affair.  Just seems like Edwards are having a hard time lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Soren Dayton/Lesson Learned &#171; NM3: New Media, Music, and Muckraking</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-138979</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Soren Dayton/Lesson Learned &#171; NM3: New Media, Music, and Muckraking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-138979</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] for the time being those of us in new media have to keep in mind that Twitter is the new Youtube, which was the new blogging, which was the new leaked email, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah&#8230; - Ezra Klien can also [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the time being those of us in new media have to keep in mind that Twitter is the new Youtube, which was the new blogging, which was the new leaked email, blah blah, blah blah, blah blah&#8230; &#8211; Ezra Klien can also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soren Dayton, John Sasso and the Twitter Election at Blog P.I.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-132135</link>
		<dc:creator>Soren Dayton, John Sasso and the Twitter Election at Blog P.I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-132135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] again, I remember well the controversy over John Edwards&#8217; brief employment of Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan, bloggers like Soren, who embarrassed the campaign with their outlandish rhetoric. The issue is not [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] again, I remember well the controversy over John Edwards&#8217; brief employment of Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan, bloggers like Soren, who embarrassed the campaign with their outlandish rhetoric. The issue is not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Tight</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-56083</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Tight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-56083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elizabeth Edwards, DU superstar...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;William Beutler&#039;s post yesterday evening caught my attention: But as the headline above has already given away, we may have blogged too soon — after all, there is someone else at the campaign who is a longtime member of the......&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Elizabeth Edwards, DU superstar&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>William Beutler&#8217;s post yesterday evening caught my attention: But as the headline above has already given away, we may have blogged too soon — after all, there is someone else at the campaign who is a longtime member of the&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-30107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-30107</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re welcome, William.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, William.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kempermanx</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-30070</link>
		<dc:creator>kempermanx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-30070</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Folks here in NC that know the Edwards, they when to UNC law school together, have always told me the EE was the smart one of the two.  Beck boy was the pretty one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Guess nothings changed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kemp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks here in NC that know the Edwards, they when to UNC law school together, have always told me the EE was the smart one of the two.  Beck boy was the pretty one.</p>
<p>Guess nothings changed.</p>
<p>Kemp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnstodder</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-29935</link>
		<dc:creator>johnstodder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-29935</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The attack on Marcotte/McEwan was not a &quot;hit job,&quot; because that connotes three elements missing here.  1) A hit job is a potentially fatal blow.  This was not.  2) A hit job is factually murky if not outright false.  This story was 100 percent true, because their writing were available for anyone to see.  3)A hit job is effective because the targeted candidate is not given time to repair the damage.  Edwards has already recovered, in my view. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No, this was a &quot;gotcha.&quot;  But a mild one, because while in the short run it hurt Edwards, it did not appear to help any other candidate.  Obama and Clinton have been dealing with their own controversies during the exact same period, and thus were unable to capitalize, not even with a &#039;look ma, no hands&#039; approach.   The GOP benefit from this is nonexistent.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Donohue strikes me as a zealous defender of a beleaguered community, sort of like Al Sharpton, not a bigot.  Anyway, he did Edwards an enormous favor by exposing his campaign&#039;s mistake now.  This will be a very old story long before it would have the chance to matter to anyone. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Swift Boat situation was the reverse.  By ignoring it, and by encouraging the media to ignore it, whatever the Swiftboaters said gained tremendous currency and emotional appeal among the right-wing blogosphere. When it finally exploded into full public view, the timing could not have been worse, and no amount of campaign or liberal media spin could contain it because the authors of the smear had a much better grasp of the relevant information and were far more practiced in articulating it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I realize by now that &quot;swiftboating&quot; has taken on a kind of Orwellian meaning that doesn&#039;t fit the actual facts of the episode.  It would make more sense if &quot;swiftboating&quot; were defined instead as a self-inflicted candidate error that is the result of wishful thinking or arrogance in the face of potentially damaging charges. Kerry was a first-rate swiftboater.  Edwards, thankfully, is not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The attack on Marcotte/McEwan was not a &#8220;hit job,&#8221; because that connotes three elements missing here.  1) A hit job is a potentially fatal blow.  This was not.  2) A hit job is factually murky if not outright false.  This story was 100 percent true, because their writing were available for anyone to see.  3)A hit job is effective because the targeted candidate is not given time to repair the damage.  Edwards has already recovered, in my view. </p>
<p>No, this was a &#8220;gotcha.&#8221;  But a mild one, because while in the short run it hurt Edwards, it did not appear to help any other candidate.  Obama and Clinton have been dealing with their own controversies during the exact same period, and thus were unable to capitalize, not even with a &#8216;look ma, no hands&#8217; approach.   The GOP benefit from this is nonexistent.  </p>
<p>Donohue strikes me as a zealous defender of a beleaguered community, sort of like Al Sharpton, not a bigot.  Anyway, he did Edwards an enormous favor by exposing his campaign&#8217;s mistake now.  This will be a very old story long before it would have the chance to matter to anyone. </p>
<p>The Swift Boat situation was the reverse.  By ignoring it, and by encouraging the media to ignore it, whatever the Swiftboaters said gained tremendous currency and emotional appeal among the right-wing blogosphere. When it finally exploded into full public view, the timing could not have been worse, and no amount of campaign or liberal media spin could contain it because the authors of the smear had a much better grasp of the relevant information and were far more practiced in articulating it. </p>
<p>I realize by now that &#8220;swiftboating&#8221; has taken on a kind of Orwellian meaning that doesn&#8217;t fit the actual facts of the episode.  It would make more sense if &#8220;swiftboating&#8221; were defined instead as a self-inflicted candidate error that is the result of wishful thinking or arrogance in the face of potentially damaging charges. Kerry was a first-rate swiftboater.  Edwards, thankfully, is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-29909</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-29909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since I like to tweek liberal&#039;s noses whenever the opportunity presents itself, I sent off an email to the spicey Amanda-panda: the email exchange went as follows:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On 2/16/07, Scott Smith wrote:
&gt; Amanda,
&gt; So, it seems that your whining has yielded a sort of publicity bonanza of
&gt; sorts. All these intervews provide wondeful forums to blather on and on
&gt; about the right-wing _______________(fill in the blank). 
&gt;
&gt; It sucks when you get torched, to wit: the right-wing noise machine had
&gt; noticed me and was looking for something with which to hurt me and my new
&gt; employers.
&gt;
&gt; But to claim victimhood is pathetic and laughable, especially since the 
&gt; liberals&#039; playbook of dirty politics has used this tactic numerous times
&gt; against various peoples: Bush, Lott, Thurmond et al.
&gt;
&gt; Let the games begin!
&gt; Cheers&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Her reply: 
On 2/16/07, Amanda Marcotte  wrote: 
Truly, sincerely, fuck off.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To which I replied:
Sweet. I love that 20-something feminist edginess...Truly and sincerely. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve also gotten this same response from other notable left-wingers, so you&#039;re in the esteemed company of Paul Begala, Chris Heinz, Eric Alterman and others. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Inhale through your nose, exhale through your mouth...repeat. Seriously, it will make you feel better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I like to tweek liberal&#8217;s noses whenever the opportunity presents itself, I sent off an email to the spicey Amanda-panda: the email exchange went as follows:</p>
<p>On 2/16/07, Scott Smith wrote:<br />
&gt; Amanda,<br />
&gt; So, it seems that your whining has yielded a sort of publicity bonanza of<br />
&gt; sorts. All these intervews provide wondeful forums to blather on and on<br />
&gt; about the right-wing _______________(fill in the blank).<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; It sucks when you get torched, to wit: the right-wing noise machine had<br />
&gt; noticed me and was looking for something with which to hurt me and my new<br />
&gt; employers.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; But to claim victimhood is pathetic and laughable, especially since the<br />
&gt; liberals&#8217; playbook of dirty politics has used this tactic numerous times<br />
&gt; against various peoples: Bush, Lott, Thurmond et al.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Let the games begin!<br />
&gt; Cheers</p>
<p>Her reply:<br />
On 2/16/07, Amanda Marcotte  wrote:<br />
Truly, sincerely, fuck off.</p>
<p>To which I replied:<br />
Sweet. I love that 20-something feminist edginess&#8230;Truly and sincerely. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also gotten this same response from other notable left-wingers, so you&#8217;re in the esteemed company of Paul Begala, Chris Heinz, Eric Alterman and others. </p>
<p>Inhale through your nose, exhale through your mouth&#8230;repeat. Seriously, it will make you feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yak Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-29830</link>
		<dc:creator>Yak Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-29830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Why weren’t you ready for a hit job from the right?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re kidding, right?  If that was a &quot;hit job&quot; then they must have been playing T-ball.  It doesn&#039;t take a Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron to hit the kind of crap those two spewed out of the park.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good luck, I hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why weren’t you ready for a hit job from the right?&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kidding, right?  If that was a &#8220;hit job&#8221; then they must have been playing T-ball.  It doesn&#8217;t take a Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron to hit the kind of crap those two spewed out of the park.</p>
<p>Good luck, I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalpartypoop.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Edwards isn’t really running for president is he?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too/comment-page-1#comment-29810</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalpartypoop.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Edwards isn’t really running for president is he?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/will-elizabeth-edwards-resign-too#comment-29810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] William Beutler makes the case that Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of the candidate, was behind the hiring of the two controversial bloggers who resigned. The piece is a little speculative for my tastes, but if anyone’s wondering “why didn’t they vet those two more thoroughly,” Beutler’s theory might explain things. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] William Beutler makes the case that Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of the candidate, was behind the hiring of the two controversial bloggers who resigned. The piece is a little speculative for my tastes, but if anyone’s wondering “why didn’t they vet those two more thoroughly,” Beutler’s theory might explain things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
