Comments on: Who is Encouraging Obama Supporters to Vandalize Sarah Palin’s Wikipedia Article?

By: Erin M Ballantine

Erin M Ballantine — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:51:10 +0000

I have to agree with GuyInCT. People put way too much faith in the validity of anything written on Wikipedia. I am actually an avid fan, but that being said I simply use it as a jumping off point for further research.

Maybe I am too anti-palin, or the article has been significantly cleaned up, but I don't really see anything that looks like vandalism. I see truths based on public record.

By: Ken Mitchell, Citrus Heights, CA

Ken Mitchell, Citrus Heights, CA — Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:30:25 +0000

I think the really INTERESTING pint about all of the leftie edits to the Palin article; a vast majority of them contain spelling and/or grammatical errors. As a Bob Barr supporter, I don’t really have a horse in this race, but I do not think it healthy for our Republic for the noisiest few in this election to have single-digit IQs.

By: JAFO

JAFO — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:27:37 +0000

When the National Enquirer broke the John Edwards affair story, Edwards' wiki page was locked. Wikipedia stated it was not a news service, and it wasn't going to allow reports on rumors.

Wikipedia seems to have gone back on that position as far as Sarah Palin is concerned.

By: G.Snapper

G.Snapper — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:58:40 +0000

The pot calling the kettle black.

Here’s a Freeper inciting other Freepers to game a PBS poll about whether Palin is qualified to be veep:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2087325/posts

By: Pete

Pete — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:16:45 +0000

lol Phil Donahue??? My god! Anyway, I think one should know that what you read on Wiki is not always true. American’s you believe the media or places such as Wiki, then we are shallow and definitely ignorant. There is no need to bring GOD into any of this either.

By: Municipalist

Municipalist — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:36:06 +0000

The McCain plagiarism tale and the Palin faux pregnancy rumors: How anonymous partisans exploit established Web brands for political ends...

[See update at end of this post.] Synopsis: We were approached recently by someone claiming to be the Wikipedia editor who made the initial anonymous charge to another blogger that the McCain campaign plagiarized material from Wikipedia for use in a sp...

By: Ms Happy

Ms Happy — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:52:19 +0000

Dear Palin,

Stay strong! Stand tall, let your hair down! Your smile and obvious faith in God is inspiring.

DO NOT go on The View or on Oprah, PLEASE! Those ladies are such bullies! If you want to be on TV, consider inviting Phil Donahue to bring his show back for 30 minutes!

Good luck in your battle. Never lose that charming smile and never answer any questions that you are not comfortable with. Your family is nobody's business! Protect your kids and never forget; you ARE the right person to be our VP and potentially President as well.

MH.

By: TigerTom

TigerTom — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:12 +0000

In the 21st Century, YOU will be able to see propaganda wars fought right in front of you, on your PC, in your home, in real time (almost).

By: Schratboy

Schratboy — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:08:35 +0000

Indeed, Ewen is a cretinous villain.

By: OMG! No Web Lulz for John McCain! : Jenn Q. Public

OMG! No Web Lulz for John McCain! : Jenn Q. Public — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:56:41 +0000

[...] people, he’s way more plugged in than Barack Obama, even if he doesn’t know how to vandalize Wikipedia and read viral email [...]