<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Lieberman?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:49:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Lieberman-Hagel Pact at Blog P.I.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman/comment-page-1#comment-136683</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lieberman-Hagel Pact at Blog P.I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman#comment-136683</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] little over a year ago, I raised the possibility that Chuck Hagel could be primaried by the right in 2008 the same as the left did to Joe Lieberman [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little over a year ago, I raised the possibility that Chuck Hagel could be primaried by the right in 2008 the same as the left did to Joe Lieberman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Beutler</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman/comment-page-1#comment-51904</link>
		<dc:creator>William Beutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman#comment-51904</guid>
		<description>Sizemore? He&#039;s no Lamont, and that&#039;s saying something. As I replied back at Blue Oregon, if it was somebody younger and fresher like Jason Atkinson I could see it. But I&#039;m a small-government type and I still think Bill Sizemore is an ass. 

On the other hand, I&#039;m not a registered Oregon voter anymore (well, maybe I am but I&#039;m done voting there unless I move back).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sizemore? He&#8217;s no Lamont, and that&#8217;s saying something. As I replied back at Blue Oregon, if it was somebody younger and fresher like Jason Atkinson I could see it. But I&#8217;m a small-government type and I still think Bill Sizemore is an ass. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;m not a registered Oregon voter anymore (well, maybe I am but I&#8217;m done voting there unless I move back).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kari Chisholm</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman/comment-page-1#comment-50899</link>
		<dc:creator>Kari Chisholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman#comment-50899</guid>
		<description>Nah, I think the Next Lieberman is Gordon Smith - and I think the Club for Growth is gearing up to do just that.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blueoregon.com/2007/03/is_the_club_for.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s the evidence.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, I think the Next Lieberman is Gordon Smith &#8211; and I think the Club for Growth is gearing up to do just that.  <a href="http://www.blueoregon.com/2007/03/is_the_club_for.html" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s the evidence.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Divided We Stand United We Fall</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman/comment-page-1#comment-49970</link>
		<dc:creator>Divided We Stand United We Fall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/the-next-lieberman#comment-49970</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can Chuck Hagel save the GOP from the Bushies?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I would like to think that the &quot;Bushies&quot; are wildly over-represented in the blogosphere, and there is a much larger plurality of traditional conservative Republicans (both libertarian and evangelical) in the electorate at large. I&#039;d like to think th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can Chuck Hagel save the GOP from the Bushies?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I would like to think that the &#8220;Bushies&#8221; are wildly over-represented in the blogosphere, and there is a much larger plurality of traditional conservative Republicans (both libertarian and evangelical) in the electorate at large. I&#8217;d like to think th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

