<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spit And Vinegar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/spit-and-vinegar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/spit-and-vinegar</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stylebook Over Substance at Blog P.I.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/spit-and-vinegar#comment-33336</link>
		<dc:creator>Stylebook Over Substance at Blog P.I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/spit-and-vinegar#comment-33336</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] See it? Since when is the &#8220;netroots&#8221; the &#8220;Net-roots&#8221; or the &#8220;Net roots&#8221;? And need it even be &#8220;Netroots&#8221;? Not to mention &#8220;grass-roots&#8221; and &#8220;grass roots.&#8221; Odd. Newspapers are given to preferring capitalization of recent coinages and separating new compound words, but even that was rendered here inconsistently. I decided to contact Michael Grunwald, who co-wrote the story and last July was the agreeable subject of a slightly critical post here, also pertaining to the use of language. Just as he did then, Grunwald got back to me quickly: I wrote the story and I wrote &#8220;netroots.&#8221; I was surprised to see that someone changed it to &#8220;Net roots&#8221;; I think it makes us look like we&#8217;ve just discovered them there Internets. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See it? Since when is the &#8220;netroots&#8221; the &#8220;Net-roots&#8221; or the &#8220;Net roots&#8221;? And need it even be &#8220;Netroots&#8221;? Not to mention &#8220;grass-roots&#8221; and &#8220;grass roots.&#8221; Odd. Newspapers are given to preferring capitalization of recent coinages and separating new compound words, but even that was rendered here inconsistently. I decided to contact Michael Grunwald, who co-wrote the story and last July was the agreeable subject of a slightly critical post here, also pertaining to the use of language. Just as he did then, Grunwald got back to me quickly: I wrote the story and I wrote &#8220;netroots.&#8221; I was surprised to see that someone changed it to &#8220;Net roots&#8221;; I think it makes us look like we&#8217;ve just discovered them there Internets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
