<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secret Hold, Secret Senator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:21:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crust</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Crust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-222</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Clarification:  When I said &quot;the left agrees&quot; I meant on earmarks, not domestic spending as a whole.  (I would hope that was obvious even if my wording logically said the opposite.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Since our host is an aficiando of typos, I feel like mentioning that I initially typed &quot;hole&quot; rather than &quot;whole&quot; which would probably be a good description of certain segments of domestic spending.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarification:  When I said &#8220;the left agrees&#8221; I meant on earmarks, not domestic spending as a whole.  (I would hope that was obvious even if my wording logically said the opposite.)</p>
<p>(Since our host is an aficiando of typos, I feel like mentioning that I initially typed &#8220;hole&#8221; rather than &#8220;whole&#8221; which would probably be a good description of certain segments of domestic spending.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crust</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Crust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-221</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WWB, thanks for the reply.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Re dirt: I guess my humor sensors were off, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for why progressive netroots / Democratic leaning blogs haven&#039;t made as big deal of pork as the Republican leaning blogs of late: Seems pretty straightforward to me.   The progressive netroots have a lot else to focus on (the War in Iraq, Katrina, etc., etc.)  The right doesn&#039;t anymore.  I don&#039;t remember hearing that much about pork from the right until last year, when the conservative mood started to turn sour on Bush, conflating Iraq with Afghanistan stopped working, etc.   Even if we just focus on the financial situation, there are three main reasons for the tide of red ink that is the US budget: 
1) domestic spending, 
2) the cost of the war in Iraq (well into 12 digits, may yet hit 13 digits despite pre-war promises that it would stay at 11 digits) 
and 3) tax cuts mostly for the wealthy.&lt;br /&gt;
For fairly obvious reasons, the right doesn&#039;t want to talk about 2) and 3) (at least from the point of view of the federal deficit).  So they focus on 1), especially the easiest target (earmarks). The left agrees on 1) they just also have a lot else they want to talk about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But really, I&#039;d rather just celebrate the bipartisan nature of this venture, sadly so rare on the blogosphere.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WWB, thanks for the reply.</p>
<p>Re dirt: I guess my humor sensors were off, sorry.</p>
<p>As for why progressive netroots / Democratic leaning blogs haven&#8217;t made as big deal of pork as the Republican leaning blogs of late: Seems pretty straightforward to me.   The progressive netroots have a lot else to focus on (the War in Iraq, Katrina, etc., etc.)  The right doesn&#8217;t anymore.  I don&#8217;t remember hearing that much about pork from the right until last year, when the conservative mood started to turn sour on Bush, conflating Iraq with Afghanistan stopped working, etc.   Even if we just focus on the financial situation, there are three main reasons for the tide of red ink that is the US budget:<br />
1) domestic spending,<br />
2) the cost of the war in Iraq (well into 12 digits, may yet hit 13 digits despite pre-war promises that it would stay at 11 digits)<br />
and 3) tax cuts mostly for the wealthy.<br />
For fairly obvious reasons, the right doesn&#8217;t want to talk about 2) and 3) (at least from the point of view of the federal deficit).  So they focus on 1), especially the easiest target (earmarks). The left agrees on 1) they just also have a lot else they want to talk about it.</p>
<p>But really, I&#8217;d rather just celebrate the bipartisan nature of this venture, sadly so rare on the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kitchens</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kitchens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-212</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Traffic-wise, porkbusters.org has been supported almost exclusively by co-founder Glenn Reynolds. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The site may be shooting itself in the foot, tho. I have twice sent email to the address listed on the site with a request to please, please, post a link to the site&#039;s archives.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I can&#039;t access the archives of the site, what&#039;s to allow me to further explore the contents of the site? You know, and discover what&#039;s there? Or follow up on a comment thread for something I posted a comment to a while back? Or maybe even posting a link from my own site in order to add my own three droplets of flow to the torrent of Instapundit&#039;s? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve received no response to the emails. Nor have I seen any change to the site. So let Glenn carry the traffic. The site on its own invites no further exploration beyond the single home page (okay, and the two featured links that are currently at the top of that page.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Traffic-wise, porkbusters.org has been supported almost exclusively by co-founder Glenn Reynolds. </p></blockquote>
<p>The site may be shooting itself in the foot, tho. I have twice sent email to the address listed on the site with a request to please, please, post a link to the site&#8217;s archives.</p>
<p>If I can&#8217;t access the archives of the site, what&#8217;s to allow me to further explore the contents of the site? You know, and discover what&#8217;s there? Or follow up on a comment thread for something I posted a comment to a while back? Or maybe even posting a link from my own site in order to add my own three droplets of flow to the torrent of Instapundit&#8217;s? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve received no response to the emails. Nor have I seen any change to the site. So let Glenn carry the traffic. The site on its own invites no further exploration beyond the single home page (okay, and the two featured links that are currently at the top of that page.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NahnCee</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>NahnCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is anyone else slightly annoyed that a Senator from a rich but non-populated state is holding the rest of the country hostage on this issue?  I never even knew there &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; such a thing as a &quot;secret hold&quot; ... and Alaska is using it over the rest of us!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else slightly annoyed that a Senator from a rich but non-populated state is holding the rest of the country hostage on this issue?  I never even knew there <em>was</em> such a thing as a &#8220;secret hold&#8221; &#8230; and Alaska is using it over the rest of us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWB</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>WWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dirt, Crust? No, more like a mild ribbing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You\&#039;re right about it being a bipartisan issue -- and the selfishness when it comes to one\&#039;s own district -- but the progressive netroots haven\&#039;t made much of an issue about it. I doubt they will, though I have a hard time putting my finger on exactly why.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirt, Crust? No, more like a mild ribbing.</p>
<p>You\&#8217;re right about it being a bipartisan issue &#8212; and the selfishness when it comes to one\&#8217;s own district &#8212; but the progressive netroots haven\&#8217;t made much of an issue about it. I doubt they will, though I have a hard time putting my finger on exactly why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crust</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Crust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, TPMm had a typo in referring to N.Z. Bear (now corrected by the way).  That&#039;s some great dirt you dug up on TPMm.  Look, everyone who is not in the Beltway hates pork (except possibly in their own district).  It&#039;s a bipartisan issue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, TPMm had a typo in referring to N.Z. Bear (now corrected by the way).  That&#8217;s some great dirt you dug up on TPMm.  Look, everyone who is not in the Beltway hates pork (except possibly in their own district).  It&#8217;s a bipartisan issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveG</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator/comment-page-1#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/secret-hold-secret-senator#comment-207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoever the &quot;Secret Senator&quot; is, he has to be absolutely livid over the string of denials (rather than &quot;no comment&quot; responses) from his cohorts.  In fact, it seems that this may be the death of the secret hold.  It&#039;s no secret if a simple process of elimination can &quot;out&quot; the culprit.  And should a Senator lie about it and later be caught in that lie, one could (and should!) expect an immediate call for impeachment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever the &#8220;Secret Senator&#8221; is, he has to be absolutely livid over the string of denials (rather than &#8220;no comment&#8221; responses) from his cohorts.  In fact, it seems that this may be the death of the secret hold.  It&#8217;s no secret if a simple process of elimination can &#8220;out&#8221; the culprit.  And should a Senator lie about it and later be caught in that lie, one could (and should!) expect an immediate call for impeachment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
