<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Register Your Discontent! II: Speculating About The Speculators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:21:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: qwan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/comment-page-1#comment-149394</link>
		<dc:creator>qwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators#comment-149394</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I really dont see any discontent in your post for these cybersquatters.
I am enraged by this behaviour. So now I see that register.com is involved with domaindiscreet. I was looking for a domain and wanted and I see that domaindiscreet picked it up 2 years ago.
I am guessing i would not have got it because I am sure someone searched for it on register.com and then did not register the same day and then register.com &quot;informed&quot; domain discreet and swooped this domain.
Godaddy used to do this for their expired domains. If you are domain expires and you forget to renew it. Then you wait till the redemption period expires and you grab the domain. But before you do another company would come in and grab the domain name. The good part is if you took up a backorder with godaddy.com you get the domain and the company only booked the domain for 5 days period(the grace period where Icaan will charge only 25c for the domain) and then they would again rebook it.  Godaddy.com was involved because I was waiting on the 5th day and when I searched on godaddy.com it would come taken. I had fortunately installed a namecheap.com search on by firefox and domain was available on that. I booked in on namecheap inspite of it showing N.A. on godaddy.com.
Then I launched a one-man campaign against godaddy.com and withing 1 month they stopped doing this. As far as I know they don&#039;t do it anymore.
Register.com i one step ahead and they grab domains that a person searches for. I think the best way to teach them a lesson is to start a campaign where every involved comes up with some &quot;believable&quot; good domains like bakeforus.com, velvetmassages.com or whitewillowinc.com and search for it on register.com.
That way they will start booking domains and they will end up with a hell a lot of useless domains.
Keep on searching them and start sending letters I want the domain.
In the end they will go under loss and stop this business.
This same kind of tactic had worked for the nigerian scams which told you that someone deposited a million dollars in a bank account in spain and you have pay them a &quot;fee&quot; to tranfer it to you.
If you responded to them they would even send you snail mail.
Someone started a site where people would simply start emailing them as a response. These people did know whom they sent the email to as they just spam in huge numbers. Then many went bankrupt just posting replies back and sending snail mail(photocopies of cheque and bank pass book).
I think someone should start this with domain grabbers and put them out of business&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dont see any discontent in your post for these cybersquatters.<br />
I am enraged by this behaviour. So now I see that register.com is involved with domaindiscreet. I was looking for a domain and wanted and I see that domaindiscreet picked it up 2 years ago.<br />
I am guessing i would not have got it because I am sure someone searched for it on register.com and then did not register the same day and then register.com &#8220;informed&#8221; domain discreet and swooped this domain.<br />
Godaddy used to do this for their expired domains. If you are domain expires and you forget to renew it. Then you wait till the redemption period expires and you grab the domain. But before you do another company would come in and grab the domain name. The good part is if you took up a backorder with godaddy.com you get the domain and the company only booked the domain for 5 days period(the grace period where Icaan will charge only 25c for the domain) and then they would again rebook it.  Godaddy.com was involved because I was waiting on the 5th day and when I searched on godaddy.com it would come taken. I had fortunately installed a namecheap.com search on by firefox and domain was available on that. I booked in on namecheap inspite of it showing N.A. on godaddy.com.<br />
Then I launched a one-man campaign against godaddy.com and withing 1 month they stopped doing this. As far as I know they don&#8217;t do it anymore.<br />
Register.com i one step ahead and they grab domains that a person searches for. I think the best way to teach them a lesson is to start a campaign where every involved comes up with some &#8220;believable&#8221; good domains like bakeforus.com, velvetmassages.com or whitewillowinc.com and search for it on register.com.<br />
That way they will start booking domains and they will end up with a hell a lot of useless domains.<br />
Keep on searching them and start sending letters I want the domain.<br />
In the end they will go under loss and stop this business.<br />
This same kind of tactic had worked for the nigerian scams which told you that someone deposited a million dollars in a bank account in spain and you have pay them a &#8220;fee&#8221; to tranfer it to you.<br />
If you responded to them they would even send you snail mail.<br />
Someone started a site where people would simply start emailing them as a response. These people did know whom they sent the email to as they just spam in huge numbers. Then many went bankrupt just posting replies back and sending snail mail(photocopies of cheque and bank pass book).<br />
I think someone should start this with domain grabbers and put them out of business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/comment-page-1#comment-126959</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators#comment-126959</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You missed ImpeachRice.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed ImpeachRice.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/comment-page-1#comment-125508</link>
		<dc:creator>Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators#comment-125508</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am looking up Domain Discreet because they immediately scooped up (apparently) a domain that lapsed because one of my clients took their time paying.  If Domain Discreet in Nova Scotia, Canada wants some lame local attorney&#039;s domain name, have at it! LMAO!!!
By they way, they may be affiliated with Register.com, since obviously Register.com let them come in like hawks and scoop it up the same day it expired.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will personally NEVER register with Register.com again. They used to be good, or so I thought, but now I know they are snakes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking up Domain Discreet because they immediately scooped up (apparently) a domain that lapsed because one of my clients took their time paying.  If Domain Discreet in Nova Scotia, Canada wants some lame local attorney&#8217;s domain name, have at it! LMAO!!!<br />
By they way, they may be affiliated with Register.com, since obviously Register.com let them come in like hawks and scoop it up the same day it expired.</p>
<p>I will personally NEVER register with Register.com again. They used to be good, or so I thought, but now I know they are snakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Beutler</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/comment-page-1#comment-83127</link>
		<dc:creator>William Beutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators#comment-83127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the follow-up, Dan! Unfortunately, I don&#039;t think I can help you. Best of luck, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the follow-up, Dan! Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think I can help you. Best of luck, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/comment-page-1#comment-82154</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators#comment-82154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mystery solved.  I am the mysterious Daniel Cook from Chicago, and yes, I do enjoy sex, and even sex 8 times in one day if possible, but have not logged into 43 things in a very long time.  The Impeachbiden.org domain was only one in a collection of almost 50 domains relating to presidential campaigns, and was by no means purchased as an endorsement of Biden impeachment, but rather in a moment of &quot;I wonder what will happen if...&quot;  as in, &quot; I wonder what will happen if I buy up a bunch of random presidential domains?&quot;  Well, the answer is clear.   Widespread, hilarious, wild, and absurd speculation about absolutey nothing!  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will you have sex with me?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dan Cook&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mystery solved.  I am the mysterious Daniel Cook from Chicago, and yes, I do enjoy sex, and even sex 8 times in one day if possible, but have not logged into 43 things in a very long time.  The Impeachbiden.org domain was only one in a collection of almost 50 domains relating to presidential campaigns, and was by no means purchased as an endorsement of Biden impeachment, but rather in a moment of &#8220;I wonder what will happen if&#8230;&#8221;  as in, &#8221; I wonder what will happen if I buy up a bunch of random presidential domains?&#8221;  Well, the answer is clear.   Widespread, hilarious, wild, and absurd speculation about absolutey nothing!  </p>
<p>Will you have sex with me?</p>
<p>Dan Cook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There&#8217;s a Spam on the Presidency, And it&#8217;s Growing at Blog P.I.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators/comment-page-1#comment-30888</link>
		<dc:creator>There&#8217;s a Spam on the Presidency, And it&#8217;s Growing at Blog P.I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/register-your-discontent-ii-speculating-about-the-speculators#comment-30888</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] P.S. Bush has twenty-three months left in office &#8212; isn&#8217;t it time to start thinking about impeaching somebody else? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P.S. Bush has twenty-three months left in office &#8212; isn&#8217;t it time to start thinking about impeaching somebody else? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
