<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L&#8217;Affaire GoldFrisch: Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Traffic As A Reverse Bell Curve (Kind Of) at Blog P.I. (beta)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Traffic As A Reverse Bell Curve (Kind Of) at Blog P.I. (beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-202</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Here at Blog P.I., we have cast aspersions on the oft-proctored renounce-your-allies tests employed by the left and right, and this is a typical case; Reynolds points readers to Little Green Footballs, but that shouldn&#8217;t constitute an endorsement of LGF&#8217;s commenters. This kind of guilt-by-association has unfairly dinged the man behind Big Orange, and Reynolds has said before this is one reason why he doesn&#8217;t have a comment section of his own. For what it&#8217;s worth, he doesn&#8217;t even self-identify as conservative, but in much of the blogosphere, it really doesn&#8217;t matter what you call yourself. And if you do describe yourself as &#8220;center&#8221; anything, you&#8217;re more likely to get burned at both ends. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here at Blog P.I., we have cast aspersions on the oft-proctored renounce-your-allies tests employed by the left and right, and this is a typical case; Reynolds points readers to Little Green Footballs, but that shouldn&#8217;t constitute an endorsement of LGF&#8217;s commenters. This kind of guilt-by-association has unfairly dinged the man behind Big Orange, and Reynolds has said before this is one reason why he doesn&#8217;t have a comment section of his own. For what it&#8217;s worth, he doesn&#8217;t even self-identify as conservative, but in much of the blogosphere, it really doesn&#8217;t matter what you call yourself. And if you do describe yourself as &#8220;center&#8221; anything, you&#8217;re more likely to get burned at both ends. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The McCain/Mele Melee I: Embargoed Until Kos Gets Around To It at Blog P.I. (beta)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>The McCain/Mele Melee I: Embargoed Until Kos Gets Around To It at Blog P.I. (beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] All of which provides an interesting coda to the offensive ally renouncement wars (we really need a better name for that phenomenon) earlier this summer. It is surely too much to ask that bloggers distance themselves from every awful thing said by someone on their own side. But is it really too much to ask that they unrenounce after the key circumstances have changed? As renunciation warrior Glenn Greenwald once memorably asked, when does the &#8220;self-correcting&#8221; blogosphere start to self-correct? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All of which provides an interesting coda to the offensive ally renouncement wars (we really need a better name for that phenomenon) earlier this summer. It is surely too much to ask that bloggers distance themselves from every awful thing said by someone on their own side. But is it really too much to ask that they unrenounce after the key circumstances have changed? As renunciation warrior Glenn Greenwald once memorably asked, when does the &#8220;self-correcting&#8221; blogosphere start to self-correct? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Already In Progress at Blog P.I. (beta)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Already In Progress at Blog P.I. (beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-35</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Wendy McElroy of iFeminists.com tackles the ballad of Deb Frisch for Fox News, as discussed here and here. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wendy McElroy of iFeminists.com tackles the ballad of Deb Frisch for Fox News, as discussed here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R. Block</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>David R. Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/laffaire-frisch-part-ii#comment-21</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Patterico has screen shots of the "unopened" Sadly, No! store with their "Rope, Tree, Conservative some assembly required" t-shirts. Sadly, No! sadly yanked it down, but Patterico still has the screen captures. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But Sadly, No! is one of Greenwald's best choices of links, yet no condemnation. Must have more to do with their political stance than true outrage. Other possiblities include Greenwald being a flaming hypocrite, and maybe more will come to me. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, Sadly, No! is reasonable, but Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler is not, over basically the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patterico has screen shots of the &#8220;unopened&#8221; Sadly, No! store with their &#8220;Rope, Tree, Conservative some assembly required&#8221; t-shirts. Sadly, No! sadly yanked it down, but Patterico still has the screen captures. </p>
<p>But Sadly, No! is one of Greenwald&#8217;s best choices of links, yet no condemnation. Must have more to do with their political stance than true outrage. Other possiblities include Greenwald being a flaming hypocrite, and maybe more will come to me. </p>
<p>So, Sadly, No! is reasonable, but Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler is not, over basically the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
