<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Trippi and Twitter&#8217;s Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/joe-trippi-and-twitters-second-life/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/joe-trippi-and-twitters-second-life</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:53:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rightwingdog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/joe-trippi-and-twitters-second-life/comment-page-1#comment-111027</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/joe-trippi-and-twitters-second-life#comment-111027</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a wild &quot;second thought&quot;. Have y&#039;all considered the following copied from above as a code of some sortws:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;price today 03:13 PM November 05, 2007 from txt&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stars 08:55 PM November 05, 2007 from txt&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know some will say that I am making up a conspiracy that does not exist. Then others will say Hmmm, could be a code and yet others will opine that Trippi is simply losing his mind. It&#039;s your choice but I am partial to the conspiracy angle. We all know the Democrats penchant for secrecy (remember the illegal meetings held buy Hillary and Ira Magaziner during the formation of &quot;Hillarycare&quot;) and we know that Edwards is a successful (read no holds barred) trial lawyer. What does that leave us with? The makings of a conspriacy and the use of code words!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RWD&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a wild &#8220;second thought&#8221;. Have y&#8217;all considered the following copied from above as a code of some sortws:</p>
<p>price today 03:13 PM November 05, 2007 from txt</p>
<p>Stars 08:55 PM November 05, 2007 from txt</p>
<p>I know some will say that I am making up a conspiracy that does not exist. Then others will say Hmmm, could be a code and yet others will opine that Trippi is simply losing his mind. It&#8217;s your choice but I am partial to the conspiracy angle. We all know the Democrats penchant for secrecy (remember the illegal meetings held buy Hillary and Ira Magaziner during the formation of &#8220;Hillarycare&#8221;) and we know that Edwards is a successful (read no holds barred) trial lawyer. What does that leave us with? The makings of a conspriacy and the use of code words!</p>
<p>RWD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightwingdog</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/joe-trippi-and-twitters-second-life/comment-page-1#comment-107922</link>
		<dc:creator>rightwingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/joe-trippi-and-twitters-second-life#comment-107922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Leave it to those  Dems, any port in the political storm to get their name or face into the public eye. 
However, I must admit that the use of &quot;cyberspace&quot; has been effective for those such as Dean, Kucinich and on the oither side, Ron Paul. 
Then again, none have been elected either and it takes 460 donations of $5.00 to equal one of $2300.00. The counter argument to that will be: that&#039;s 460 votes vs. one vote though. 
Yeah sure it is,all those type of contributors do not vote, just as every respondent to a poll does not vote the way he/she responds. 
In summation, I do believe the Internet has changed political campaigning dramatically and has really only scratched the surface. The social networking sites are overflowing with political hooey on boths sides and there are BLOGS about politics galore (I have one of my own), some with great content and some with baloney.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RWD&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to those  Dems, any port in the political storm to get their name or face into the public eye.<br />
However, I must admit that the use of &#8220;cyberspace&#8221; has been effective for those such as Dean, Kucinich and on the oither side, Ron Paul.<br />
Then again, none have been elected either and it takes 460 donations of $5.00 to equal one of $2300.00. The counter argument to that will be: that&#8217;s 460 votes vs. one vote though.<br />
Yeah sure it is,all those type of contributors do not vote, just as every respondent to a poll does not vote the way he/she responds.<br />
In summation, I do believe the Internet has changed political campaigning dramatically and has really only scratched the surface. The social networking sites are overflowing with political hooey on boths sides and there are BLOGS about politics galore (I have one of my own), some with great content and some with baloney.</p>
<p>RWD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
