<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foer The Record, Siegel Reinstated [Updated: Or Maybe Not]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/foer-the-record-siegel-reinstated/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/foer-the-record-siegel-reinstated</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:49:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Blogosphere is What You Make of It at Blog P.I. (beta)</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/foer-the-record-siegel-reinstated/comment-page-1#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blogosphere is What You Make of It at Blog P.I. (beta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/foer-the-record-siegel-reinstated#comment-444</guid>
		<description>[...] As I have written before, what he did wrong was blending multiple online personalities &#8212; one identifiably Siegel and one claimedly not-Siegel, had the latter defend the former as if they were distinct individuals. This would have been equally wrong had he done so under the aegis of a free Blogspot account. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I have written before, what he did wrong was blending multiple online personalities &#8212; one identifiably Siegel and one claimedly not-Siegel, had the latter defend the former as if they were distinct individuals. This would have been equally wrong had he done so under the aegis of a free Blogspot account. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

