<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feud for Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/feud-for-thought/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net/feud-for-thought</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:49:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBK</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/feud-for-thought/comment-page-1#comment-128430</link>
		<dc:creator>DBK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/feud-for-thought#comment-128430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I see your point, and while I don&#039;t see the anti-X reporting in most cases, there&#039;s little doubt in my own mind that Huffington Post has been steadily, consistently, and to some extent outrageously anti-Hillary Clinton and doing its best to knock her at every possible opportunity.  That&#039;s the reason I stopped visiting that site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have, at my own teeny blog, been accused by a somewhat irrational Obama supporter of doing some sort of dirty deed by offering a criticism of Senator Obama, so I agree that there is a bit of craziness going on, but there are two points I want to make in conclusion:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) Not every accusation of this sort is off the mark.  In the case of Huffington Post, it is fairly obvious that the site is very partisan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2) This division will not damage the chances of the Democratic candidate when he or she is finally determined.  There may be division in the primaries, but there is no division over the ultimate goal and Democrats will come together to support their candidate, whoever that may be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point, and while I don&#8217;t see the anti-X reporting in most cases, there&#8217;s little doubt in my own mind that Huffington Post has been steadily, consistently, and to some extent outrageously anti-Hillary Clinton and doing its best to knock her at every possible opportunity.  That&#8217;s the reason I stopped visiting that site.</p>
<p>I have, at my own teeny blog, been accused by a somewhat irrational Obama supporter of doing some sort of dirty deed by offering a criticism of Senator Obama, so I agree that there is a bit of craziness going on, but there are two points I want to make in conclusion:</p>
<p>1) Not every accusation of this sort is off the mark.  In the case of Huffington Post, it is fairly obvious that the site is very partisan.</p>
<p>2) This division will not damage the chances of the Democratic candidate when he or she is finally determined.  There may be division in the primaries, but there is no division over the ultimate goal and Democrats will come together to support their candidate, whoever that may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

