website statistics

Archive for the 'Seriously' Category

Our 500 Beats Your 250

Yesterday at the Gawker-owned Valleywag blog, contributor Paul Boutin reported on, then expanded upon, a phrase he says is going around the Silicon Valley: “the 250.” According to Boutin, the term is

a cruelly sarcastic euphemism used in real-life conversations for the small, cliquey group of self-appointed Web 2.0 insiders who seem to spend their days blogging and Twittering about one another. The gist is that The 250 are the 250 people who matter to The 250.

I don’t know about you, but that sure sounds to me like the “Gang of 500,” coined by Mark Halperin for ABC’s once-influential The Note. Its usage has fallen off in the past year; the phrase doesn’t appear in The Note’s archives since Halperin left to create Time’s The Page. I can’t be sure Halperin isn’t still using it, at least until Time introduces The Search.

In any case, these insidery nicknames are innocuous enough if a little annoying. As if the Beltway and Valley cultures aren’t insular enough, apparently we also have to give the elites of this elite an arbitrary fixed number to serve as a nickname.

As we’re all well aware, it’s said that DC is Hollywood for ugly people. But maybe this is wrong. Equating the District with LA is a bit presumptuous on our part. It might be more accurate to say that New York City is Hollywood for busy people. Or that Hollywood is New York for flaky people.

We shouldn’t pretend the Beltway is in their league. No, the Valley is our proper analogue. Heck, even Northern Virginia has its share of high tech companies. But then, they’ve got an Apple and a Google and a Cisco and we’ve got… AOL, which is relocating to NYC in hopes of turning itself around. I guess that means the Valley is DC for people who are good at math. Which I suppose means DC is the Valley for poor people. So, maybe our 500 doesn’t beat your 250 after all.

More Obama-Related Plagiarism?

I can’t keep up with all the plagiarism-related allegations against the Obama campaign, but I did notice the headline on this story by John Dickerson, currently on the front page of Slate…

Slate Plagiarizes NBC?

…bears unmistakable similarities to this recent clip by NBC’s Andrea Mitchell…

Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC

…from a week ago Tuesday night. Which leads me to ask… well, nothing really. However, when it comes to the charges against Barack Obama, I am inclined to agree with James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal. As he wrote yesterday,

isn’t it a bit heavy-handed to accuse Obama of plagiarism? This is a serious charge in academia and journalism, professions in which words are the final product. By contrast, language is a mere instrument for politicians. They hire speechwriters to put words in their mouths, something that would also be frowned upon in academia and journalism. Are voters really going to be dissuaded from backing Obama because as a politician he failed to adhere to the ethical standards that would have applied if he were a professor or a reporter? Not likely.

P.S. It’s fair to note, it isn’t Dickerson I am elbowing here — it’s Slate headline writers, who are notorious more for being misleading than for being copycats.

P.P.S. For what it’s worth, I see Crooks and Liars commenter lokmon beat me to the punch.

Return of the Smoke-Filled Back Room

My colleague Brian Devine, a good Democrat even though he once sported a Fred Thompson sticker on his car (next to one for Mark Warner), is not enthusiastic about where the fight for his party’s nomination is headed:

The point of all this is that since the primary is so close, one of these two groups composed of the Democratic leadership — the superdelegates or the credentials committee — will be the body that decides who will become the Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nominee. And not the voters. Prior to today, I believed that the largest flaw in our electoral system was the leapfrogging of states for earlier primary dates. But now it is clear that I was wrong. The Democratic Party can’t get much more undemocratic than not letting the people decide.

There’s more to it than that, and if you’re unfamiliar with the situation he quotes enough to give you the full background.

Meantime, I’m left more than a little amused that the Republican Party nomination process — which features no superdelegates and dealt with its state parties’ “earliest” one-upsmanship in a less extreme manner — is actually more democratic than that of the Democratic Party.

Blazers for President

As I noted in my semi-live blog on Iowa caucus night, my Portland Trail Blazers are on a roll. Despite #1 draft pick Greg Oden sitting out his rookie season after microfracture surgery, this relatively-inexperienced team (the youngest in the NBA) has won 16 of their last 17 games.

Indeed, they are no longer the Jail Blazers, although that rep did carry the upside of seeing more Blazer jerseys than Wizards jerseys in the District.

Meanwhile, Blazermania has gripped the Portland metropolitan area like it hasn’t in nearly a decade. For the first time since anyone can remember, home games are actually selling out. The team has encouraged this by offering package deals for tickets like the four-tickets-for-$88 that put me in a seat at Paul Allen’s allegedly-bankrupt Rose Garden this December for the first time since the 2000 Western Conference Finals (from which I may never fully recover).

And it’s not just special ticket packages — the Blazers are making concerted pitches meant to appeal to Blazer fans’ better basketball selves. Here’s one that’s currently on the official Blazers website, that I thought was worthy of noting here:

Blazers website appeal sure looks like a campaign fundraising appeal

Now, tell me that doesn’t sound like a last-minute campaign fundraising appeal. In fact, all they need now is a fundraising bat.

To Boldly GOP Where No… The Blog on the Edge of… Sorry, I Got Nothing

Via Buzz Brockway on Twitter and Peach Pundit, artwork from a new article in Campaigns and Elections:

Campaigns & Elections artwork featuring Erick Erickson, David All, Patrick Ruffini and Rob Bluey in Star Trek uniforms

A hearty congrats to all featured, and I think my colleague the Virginia delegate to QandO may be quoted in the piece. Yet the pay wall leaves me wondering. As a resister of all things Star Trek (and sympathizer with K-Lo at The Corner on this) I’m not sure if I should be envious; Matt Lewis’s Town Hall commenters are pretty harsh, and not just the Ronulans.

But the article isn’t public, so I can’t judge for myself, nor can bloggers or their commentariats. C&E publishes much of its content on the website, but right now there is a little C&E dollar icon symbol next to the one article that’s actually about bloggers. Who are the ad wizards at C&E who came up with this one?

I also wonder if the falling out between David and Erick (and others) from a few months back gets any inches. My guess is not, and even if I’m wrong, it makes me think it’s too bad Wonkette doesn’t report on its city’s industry in the same depth as Valleywag (retooled in early 2007) or even Gawker (retooling, but not pulled).

Certainly the Beltway and the District is as much a company town as the Silicon Valley/Palo Alto, so where’s the 100-word-version? Someone, please, quote the key grafs in a blog post. Make it so.

And to tell the truth, I probably watched ST:TNG on afternoon television for at least thee years in middle school.

Update: I have now read the article, and I am pleasantly surprised that the kerfuffle noted above is indeed covered, and that author Walter Alarkon even used the word “kerfuffle.” Aside from the annoying Star Trek motif and an embarrassingly lame pull quote, the article does a reasonably good job of explaining the current challenges Republican web strategists face. If the piece brings a wider awareness to these issues, it’ll have done all it needs to.

You can read the article here in the original layout; thanks to Theodora in the comments for bringing it to my attention. Still, the snazzy NXTbook software (which doesn’t even live on the C&E page) features no plain text, so it’s next to invisible to search engines. Likewise, it doesn’t let you copy and paste, so it’s next to useless for blogging.

Updated again: In the comments, it has been pointed out that there is an XML page running in the background, so it’s not a total SEO disaster. Meanwhile, Rob Bluey is weighing in…

I wasn’t going to post it, but I feel the need to set the record straight. For starters, I hate Star Trek.

Josh Marshall’s Readers Are… Not So Bright

This end of a post at Talking Points Memo today made me laugh:

If Romney loses Iowa after having spent $1.8 billion there and then loses in his backyard in New Hampshire he’ll be in bad, bad shape. The horrid press over the following few weeks would likely kill him.

(ed.note: I had meant the reference to Mitt’s $1.8 billion in spending in Iowa to be an obvious bit of sarcasm at Romney’s expense. But it seems Romney’s efforts to buy the Republican nomination have become so notorious and proverbial that many readers are asking if it’s really true. So, no, I believe his spending is well below $1.8 billion. But he wants it really bad and there’s still a day left. So who knows.)

$1.8 billion sounds plausible? Using what counting system?

Elsewhere on the web today, a Des Moines-based WFAA reporter says Romney has spent $4 million on TV ads; also today, Fred Thompson [disclosure] aide Rich Galen writes in a column for CNS news,

according to the Professional Guessing Class, [Romney] may have spent upwards of $8 MILLION here

If Romney has in fact spent $8 million, which doesn’t sound like a bad guess, then he would have to spend 225 times that in order to spend $1.8 billion. CNN says all the candidates combined have spent $40 million on TV ads; I’d be surprised if there was a billion dollars worth of TV time to be had in Iowa in an entire year.

If Romney really dropped that much money in the state, Iowa could practically retire, and hey, maybe accede to another state or system its coveted first-in-the-nation status. Which would probably be a good thing for everyone. Except, of course, Iowa.

P.S. For example, see this from First Read:

MOUNT PLEASANT, Iowa — A woman who famously switched from volunteering for Clinton to Obama has changed her mind… again. …

“Probably I’ll caucus for Richardson,” she said after Edwards spoke. “My guess is he won’t be viable, and then I’ll probably scoot right over to Edwards.”

Are Iowans really so serious about their vote? Or are they spoiled and self-indulgent? In another state, I’ll bet voters would not feel so entitled, political observers would not ascribe such mythical status to their choices, and just maybe, subsequent states would have a bigger say in the primary process.

Alas, as my former Hotline colleague Reid Wilson explains, attempts at reform might be about as easy to properly implement as the Fair Tax.

P.S. After some consideration, I actually wish I had called this “Josh Marshall’s Readers Are… Not So Good With Numbers.”

The First Campaign E-mail of 2008

In case you were wondering, this is it. Merry Auld Lang Syne to David Plouffe for drawing the short straw:

First election-related e-mail of 2008 belongs to David Plouffe of Barack Obama’s camapign

As you can see, this arrived at exactly 12:30. I’ll predict that by 2012 — 2016 at the latest — the first campaign e-mail of the election year will arrive at 12:01.

Thirty minutes? In politics, that’s a lifetime! Well, at least it’s a news cycle.

All Your Headlines Are Belong to Atrios

I am an unabashaed Memeorandum fan and booster, and in the past I have said: I would praise the “impressive signal-to-noise ratio, but the fact is, there’s no noise.”

But as of late Friday/early Saturday, this is the top story:

Bizarre Atrios headline on Memeorandum

Actual header on the HuffPo report:

Bill Kristol To Become New York Times Columnist In 2008

Atrios is listed first among “Sites Linking to This Page…” so that probably has something to do with the mishap, though it doesn’t actually explain it. As for “Jesus H. Christ,” your guess is as good as mine. Same for the “(2)” bit, whatever that refers to.

Here’s the Atrios post linking, for what it’s worth:

Your Liberal Media

Publishing lying conservative psychopaths since I can remember.

No Jesus there, nor at HuffPo.

I’m sure whatever this is will be fixed before long, but it suggests a problem for Gabe Rivera’s meme-tracker (and its sister sites) in the near future: as blogs continue to be added to the Memeorandum list, and those sites change trade in their simple CMSs for more elaborate ones, Memeorandum could get noisier.

For awhile now I’ve noticed an existing issue where authors of posts are sometimes misidentified — especially blogs at National Review Online, where even posts on Jim Geraghty’s Campaign Spot are often listed simply as “NationalReview.com” and attributed to Katherine Jean Lopez. I searched the December Memeorandum archives for an example, but came up empty, so you’ll have to take my word for the moment. My impression is that posts on The Corner are properly attributed, but the other NRO blogs are not.

Don’t get me wrong, Memeorandum is still the best gauge of what’s happening in the political blogosphere right now, but it isn’t 100%. It is still something like 99%, and I hope it stays at least that good.

Update: Gabe responds in the comments:

Thanks William. Made a manual fix after your post tripped one of my alerts. Not sure what the underlying problem was…I’m not able to reproduce it. Hope it doesn’t happen again. I guess this shows days go by when I don’t even look at memeorandum. That is definitely the case. As for the bigger picture, notwithstanding this, I think my system is always improving at extracting headlines, bodies etc. There has always been an error rate, and it’s being gradually reduced, but will always be non-negligible.

Why Buy the Book When You Can Get the Blog for Free?

The number of books about the political blogosphere climbs ever upward, and today I see that yet another is on the way, from Democratic Virginia blogger-consultants Lowell Feld and Nate Wilcox. The book won’t be out until the middle of 2008, but Feld announced it in a post on Raising Kaine last night. It’s called “Netroots Rising: How a Citizen Army of Bloggers and Online Activists Is Changing American Politics,” and it’s already listed on Amazon:

Netroots Rising by Lowell Feld and Nate Wilcox, as seen on Amazon

Wait. I think I need to do an exaggerated double-take, for comic effect:

Netroots Rising by Lowell Feld and Nate Wilcox, as seen on Amazon

Forty bucks? What is this, a college-level textbook? A coffee table book? Merely oversized? Is it 800 pages? I buy enough books that my Amazon Prime account pays for itself, and I can’t remember the last time I shelled out this much for a book that wasn’t out-of-print.

For comparison, here are the Amazon listings for other recent (though indeed they are all recent) books about politics and the Internet:

Political blog books by Garrett Graff, Matt Bai, Glenn Reynolds, Markos Moulitsas, Jerome Armstrong and Hugh Hewitt

These aren’t all new, and they’re not all hardcover. But you’ll see that the two released this fall — the tomes by Graff and Bai — are indeed hardback, and with Amazon discounts they cost less than half of “Netroots Rising.”

It is certainly the kind of book I would be inclined to buy. I bought most of the books listed above, mostly from Amazon, and mostly when they were brand new. But at forty bucks, I may just have to apply for a library card.

The Onion’s Favorite Blogger

The latest edition of The Onion contains a brief item poking fun at the blogosphere:

Entire Blogosphere Stunned By Blogger’s Special Weekend Post
November 28, 2007 | Issue 43•48

NEW YORK—In what is being called a seminal moment in Internet history, a rare weekend post by 25-year-old blogger Ben Tiedemann on his website bentiedemanntellsall.blogspot.com rocked the 50 million-member blogosphere this Saturday.

The landmark post, which updated nearly every member of the global online community on the shelf Tiedemann was building, was linked to by several thousand sites, including Daily Kos, Digg, and The New York Times.

Wow, what a special treat this was for all of us,” said Talking Points Memo head blogger Joshua Micah Marshal, who, along with all other bloggers, checks Tiedemann’s site every day just in case something monumental occurs. “I thought I was going to have to wait until Monday to find out if Ben decided to put [the shelf] in his bedroom or the living room. The pictures were great, too.”

Within two hours of going live, Tiedemann’s 15-word post received 34,634,897 comments.

But who is Ben Tiedemann? It turns out, he’s one of their one-shot op-ed “contributors.” In fact, “Ben Tiedemann” boasted about his blog in The Onion in May of this year:

Ben Tiedemann, The Onion’s favorite blogger

Follow the given URL, and it turns out Ben Tiedemann Tells All is a real blog, although it’s not much of one. Between May 14 and 16 of this year, someone — one assumes the true author of the initial article (and very likely the latest one) — grabbed the Blogspot account named above and created an account to post… garbled poetry? Here’s the initial post, in its entirety:

here are the launch codes you asked for

one day I’ll say give me back
the charts and graphs of my youth
that once defended the world stage
the apocalyptic drift takes it all in
totalling all the extra doors with ways

they’ll say strange things exist in what he is
no one will ever see the last of it for sure
one must learn not to learn the language
thank the easiness of cutting up the effects
build in an ornamental discussion of meaning
and three things have elements of or on blank

there are reasons to see the sunrise
that would prove extremely disturbing
if revealed to the general public then
this time of global wealth creation lifestyle
for the reign of absolute ecstasy can’t end
the next in the order of which came first
there it is sound and sense together in love
you can hear it in the constant little facts

There is a Gmail address associated with the Blogger profile, so I sent “Ben Tiedemann” a message earlier this week, but haven’t heard back. I am quite certain the account has long since been abandoned. But if I hear anything, I’ll let you know.