website statistics

Archive for the 'Seriously' Category

Bloggingheads.tv: The Week in Twitter

Late last week I made my third appearance on Bloggingheads.tv with Bill Scher of Liberal Oasis; we talked about the politics of Twitter, whether #dontgo is a genuine movement or not, whether Obama is underperforming or overperforming, how to understand the different types of voters, why McCain’s “Celeb” ad was a success, veepstakes and the pointlessness thereof, including my favorite theory on why McCain will choose Romney. Check it out:

I might as well get this out of the way: I am not actually about to eat the viewer. It just looks that way.

Bush and Batman vs. Bush and Batman

Batman on the phone with… George W. Bush?Three is a trend in journalism, but two is all Blog P.I. needs, as completely separate but nevertheless intriguing comparisons of George W. Bush with Bruce Wayne (and vice versa) have been flying all across the Internets the last few days.

Making the rounds of the political blogosphere is an op-ed by novelist Andrew Klavan from today’s Wall Street Journal titled “What Bush and Batman Have in Common”:

There seems to me no question that the Batman film “The Dark Knight,” currently breaking every box office record in history, is at some level a paean of praise to the fortitude and moral courage that has been shown by George W. Bush in this time of terror and war. Like W, Batman is vilified and despised for confronting terrorists in the only terms they understand. Like W, Batman sometimes has to push the boundaries of civil rights to deal with an emergency, certain that he will re-establish those boundaries when the emergency is past.

And like W, Batman understands that there is no moral equivalence between a free society — in which people sometimes make the wrong choices — and a criminal sect bent on destruction. The former must be cherished even in its moments of folly; the latter must be hounded to the gates of Hell.

“The Dark Knight,” then, is a conservative movie about the war on terror. And like another such film, last year’s “300,” “The Dark Knight” is making a fortune depicting the values and necessities that the Bush administration cannot seem to articulate for beans.

It may also be worth noting that comic book writer and artist Frank Miller, author of the graphic novels “300″ and 1986’s “The Dark Knight Returns,” upon which all non-Schumacher Batmans since have been modeled, is working on a new Batman graphic novel: “Holy Terror, Batman!” Yes, it’s Batman vs. al-Qaeda.

The second Bush-Batman juxtaposition, which I first saw on Digg yesterday, is a series of Leno-esque person-on-the-street interviews by Philadelphia sketch comedy troupe Secret Pants. The interviewer has a set of quotes that were spoken either by President Bush from 1600 Pennsylvania or Adam West from the 1960s TV show. Passersby are asked to guess which. It’s definitely worth your 3:35:

The New Hotlineness

I’d been hearing the rumors for a few weeks but, finally, the new National Journal site design has had its debut. But on a Friday?

In Washington, bad news always gets released on Fridays. The idea is to bury it just as the week’s traditional news cycle is winding down — as reporters are racing to get out of, or heading out on the, town.

Is that what’s going on here? Here’s the page specific to The Hotline, so you be the judge:

The New Hotline website design on National Journal

It’s certainly much more modern than the National Journal website of old (see below right). You can’t tell from the screen shot, but there is just as much actual content on the page; it’s just been pushed below the fold. Now it resembles nothing so much as a wonkier version of Slate (which has had its own disastrous redesigns, not that I’m calling this one disastrous).

But that red is so neon it looks like it belongs on the cover of Wired, and for the moment it clashes badly with the colors of the sponsor’s advertisement.

Classic (Old) Hotline website designIt also looks odd next to the darker red, which is more representative of the colors used across the site. Indeed, click over to Congress Daily and National Journal (aka “The Magazine”) and you may think you’re losing your eyesight.

On the other hand, I count two links to my old online column/daily blog report, The Blogometer, apparently the only National Journal feature with two links on this particular page. That alone is enough to get a thumbs-up from me.

Well done, National Journal!

All the Rage #2: All the Truthiness that’s Fitna to Vandalize

Stephen Colbert once said of Wikipedia, “any site that’s got a longer entry on ‘truthiness’ than on Lutherans has its priorities straight.” I remember checking on this at the time, and he was correct about the length of the respective articles. And I tend to share his actual point, that people are too interested in entertainment — such as Colbert himself. But that isn’t the end of the story: the spotlight Colbert shone on Wikipedia surely led to the current status quo: the articles for Truthiness and Lutheranism are currently about the same length.

Which is a good jumping off point for the second installment of our look at the top-edited articles on Wikipedia.

  1. Article: Major Boobage
    Why: It’s third episode of South Park’s twelfth season.
    Detail: Last week, the entry for the previous episode was number four on this list. Because a new article will be created for each new episode over the next few weeks, expect weird titles like the above to wind up somewhere on this list each week. And how many edits, total? 433 by noon Sunday EDT.
  2. Article: Fitna (film)
    Why: A 15-minute documentary film criticizing Islam and the Koran, written, directed and produced by Dutch politician Geert Wilders, released on the Internet this week.
    Egg McMuffin, courtesy iiraa on Flickr.Detail: The movie credits actually lists the official website as being at wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitna on both the Dutch (.nl) and English (.en) editions. Problem is, in each case this is a disambiguation page, because it’s an Arabic word with a few related entries already. Was this a simple mistake, or an attempt to supersede the other Wikipedia articles? Either way, whether to move the article for the movie into the space occupied by the disambiguation page has been the most controversial issue surrounding this article, and remains unresolved.
  3. Article: Deaths in 2008
    Why: Passing on this week: actor Richard Widmark, Beatles music executive Neil Aspinall, pioneering radio talker Wally Phillips, NFL draft prospect Heath Benedict, Cambodian photojournalist Dith Pran and my favorite: Herb Peterson, inventor of the Egg McMuffin.
    Detail: This was number three last week as well, although last week’s deaths were more publicized. Also resolved since last week: Abigail Taylor, the Minnesota girl who died following injuries sustained from a public swimming pool, passed muster for notability and has an article again.
  4. Article: 2008 Tibetan unrest
    Why: Violence has subsided but not ended entirely, and governments around the world are weighing whether to boycott the Olympic Games.
    Detail: Last week, this article was on the list as 2008 unrest in Tibet (see below). The article was suggested to be renamed when it became apparent the protests were no longer confined to Tibet. However, the move didn’t actually occur until more than a week later.
  5. Protest of Chinese involvement in Tibet, courtesy Taekwonweirdo on Flickr.Article: American Idol (season 7)
    Why: It’s the current season, and contestants are being eliminated every week.
    Detail: A high number of edits from IP addresses suggest that people unlikely to edit Wikipedia articles otherwise are contributing heavily to this one. My favorite edit summary: “Chikezie’s name has been revealed and known throughout the season, you incompetent twatwaffle. He goes solely by his first name on the show.”
  6. Article: Sea otter
    Why: It was on the Wikipedia Main Page as a Featured Article on Monday, bringing renewed attention to this otherwise uncontroversial subject.
    Detail: Well, not entirely uncontroversial. It was also the target of vandalism in November 6 because of… South Park. Comedy Central is so far out ahead of Wikipedia it’s not even worth keeping count.
  7. Article: ICarly
    Why: The Nickelodeon show just finished its first season, is being released on the Internet and seems to be getting plenty of coverage lately. Aside from that, I’m stumped.
    Detail: That’s really iCarly, but for some reason, the software powering Wikipedia changes lowercase first letters to uppercase. See also: IPod and IPhone.
  8. Article: 2008 unrest in Tibet
    Why: See number four.
    Detail: Had the name not changed mid-week, it would have been the top-edited article of the week.
  9. Davidson star Stephen Curry, courtesy Sail Whitestone on Flickr.Article: Stephen Curry (basketball)
    Why: The son of former Charlotte Hornets star player and current Charlotte Bobcats assistant Del Curry, the younger Curry leads this year’s NCAA playoffs Cinderella team, the Charlotte-area Davidson Wildcats. Later today he’ll lead the Wildcats against Kansas as both vie to crack the Final Four.
    Detail: Curry’s rivals must be turning out, because a high percentage of these edits are vandalism and then the reversion of said vandalism. And I’ll admit, some of it is funny.
  10. Article: American Idol
    Why: See number five.
    Detail: I’m really not the best person to be writing this. After all, I get most of my American Idol news from Tony Kornheiser.
  11. Holdovers this week: 2008 unrest in Tibet, Deaths in 2008.

    Falling off the list: Arthur C. Clarke, Britney’s New Look, Bear Sterns, David Paterson, 2008 NCAA Men’s Division I Basketball Tournament, Horton Hears a Who! (film), Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Brian Posehn

Images courtesy iiraa, Taekwonweirdo and Sail Whitestone.

Stuff Conservative People Like

Stuff White People Like, the meteorically ascendant concept blog categorizing fetish objects, stereotypical behaviors and obnoxious trends of what one might call the “typical white person,” has a conservative slant. Really.

I’m sure that wasn’t the intent of Christian Lander, a Canadian copywriter living in Los Angeles who started the blog on a whim in late January and already has a book deal. But it certainly has the effect.

That’s because his ongoing list avoids going after the kind of “aw shucks” Middle Americans Jeff Foxworthy tenderly mocked in his rise to relative stardom more than a decade ago. Instead, Lander zeroes in on the accoutrements of the kind of upper-class, highly-educated, self-conscious white people variously known as Lexus liberals (Prius liberals?) or latte liberals. What David Brooks would call Bobos, minus twenty years. Like Foxworthy, he’s making fun of himself. But he also does so in greater detail, and with more bite.

Take for example #62 Knowing What’s Best for Poor People:

White people spend a lot of time of worrying about poor people. It takes up a pretty significant portion of their day.

They feel guilty and sad that poor people shop at Wal*Mart instead of Whole Foods, that they vote Republican instead of Democratic, that they go to Community College/get a job instead of studying art at a University.

It is a poorly guarded secret that, deep down, white people believe if given money and education that all poor people would be EXACTLY like them. In fact, the only reason that poor people make the choices they do is because they have not been given the means to make the right choices and care about the right things.

Or #82 Hating Corporations:

One of the more popular white person activities of the past fifteen years is attempting to educate others on the evils of multi-national corporations. White people love nothing more than explaining to you how Wal*Mart, McDonalds, Microsoft, Halliburton are destroying the Earth’s culture and resources. …

When engaging in a conversation about corporate evils it is important to NEVER, EVER mention Apple Computers, Target or Ikea in the same breath as the companies mentioned earlier. White people prefer to hate corporations that don’t make stuff that they like.

And we’re not even talking about the kind of cultural affectations that any economic libertarian city-dweller might recognize as themselves, too. See #6 Organic Food:

Because of the balance of global wealth and power, there is a general assumption that white people are pretty shrewd. And for the most part, history has proven this to be true. But white people have one great weakness: organic food.

As seen by the image on the left – when faced with eating food that has been processed and loaded with nitrates, sodium and saturated fat, or organic rat poison, 10/10 they will take the rat poison.

I’m not just cherry-picking from the blog. In a Los Angeles Times article published barely a month into the blog’s phenomenal run, Lander evinced a disdain for the provincial lefty superiority he mocks in his blog posts:

Lander is less concerned with cross-ethnic and racial relations than he is with how whites treat each other. As a onetime graduate student in the Midwest, he got tired of coastal condescension of the fly-over states and the glib assumption that “red staters are evil and stupid.”

“Too many white people don’t like to be reminded that they’re white. They like to think that white people are those evil corporate right-wingers or the uneducated masses who vote the wrong way. But ‘enlightened whites’ are white people too and have just as much of a group mentality as they think the red staters have.”

But, let’s not make too much of this. From the same article:

Lander doesn’t want you to think he’s angry or taking himself too seriously. “First and foremost, it’s satire; it’s funny,” he says. “I’m trying to make people laugh.”

Yet on the rare occasions where Lander does take a swipe at conservatives or conservatism, it still veers back toward making fun of liberals post haste. Take #35 The Daily Show/Colbert Report:

White people love to make fun of politics, especially right wing politics. It’s a pretty easy target and makes for some decent humor, but white people are actually starting to believe that these two shows are becoming legitimate news sources.

“Oh, I don’t watch the news,” they will say. “I watch the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. You know, studies show that viewers of those shows are more educated than people who watch Fox News or CNN.”

Like so. One could also see this as liberal humor at its best: avoiding easy jokes about President Bush mangling his words (yes, Jacob Weisberg is still riding this horse into the ground — so far he might make it to China in time for the Olympics) and looking inward to mock one’s own absurdities. And that would probably be true, but they’re not mutually exclusive options.

Let’s also stipulate — the next time someone says there’s no such thing as conservative humor, just point them to Stuff White People Like. If they’re white and liberal, chances are they will enjoy a joke at their own expense. If they’re white and conservative, chances are they’ll find it even funnier.

A better question would be: Could a conservative do this just as well? Anybody who’s read one of P.J. O’Rourke’s classics — think Parliament of Whores or All The Trouble in the World — can say unequivocally, yes. But it’s also possible a lesser talent could really screw it up. In fact, it’s more than possible.

I suppose a symmetrical analogy for black people could be Bill Cosby’s complaints about the self-abegnating habits of lower-class African Americans. But Cosby isn’t trying to be funny. The real analogy was Comedy Central’s brilliant Chappelle’s Show. But Dave Chappelle famously walked away from that, fearing he was doing more harm than good. Which is too bad, especially in a world where Black People Love Us! already existed.

In the meantime, I’ve just discovered Michael Cobb’s Stuff Black People Like. Where’s his book deal? Oh, that’s right — he’s a conservative.

Old New Media

Seen this morning on the side of a Metro bus in Northwest Washington:

RealClearPolitics ad on Metrobus

RCP ad on Metrobus

Of course, RealClearPolitics may have started as a hastily-assembled morning news aggregator out of Chicago, but John McIntyre and Tom Bevan’s brand has expanded greatly since first partnering with Time Warner, and now that Forbes has a controlling stake.

It’s a bit jarring to see a purely web-based property appearing on a hunk of twentieth-century technology lumbering through the neighborhood, but as old media continues to acquire new media titles, there’s no reason to think we won’t see more of this. Maybe a lot more of this.

What’s next, Matt Yglesias on a billboard? An Andrew Sullivan bobblehead?

A Match Made in Twitter

Someone out there knows I’m a connoisseur of “fake” Twitter accounts, and late this morning, forwarded me an e-mail that I cannot help but screencap and share:

E-mail of Barack Obama reciprocally following a fake Jeremiah Wright on Twitter

Twelve hours later, there is one perfunctory tweet. In fact, it appears this account was created with one purpose in mind. That’s reflected in the e-mail above and, publicly, in the sidebar:

Sidebar on fake Jeremiah Wright Twitter account shows only one follower: Obama

Count this as an overlooked reason why Twitter will succeed: its endless capacity for mischief.

Our 500 Beats Your 250

Yesterday at the Gawker-owned Valleywag blog, contributor Paul Boutin reported on, then expanded upon, a phrase he says is going around the Silicon Valley: “the 250.” According to Boutin, the term is

a cruelly sarcastic euphemism used in real-life conversations for the small, cliquey group of self-appointed Web 2.0 insiders who seem to spend their days blogging and Twittering about one another. The gist is that The 250 are the 250 people who matter to The 250.

I don’t know about you, but that sure sounds to me like the “Gang of 500,” coined by Mark Halperin for ABC’s once-influential The Note. Its usage has fallen off in the past year; the phrase doesn’t appear in The Note’s archives since Halperin left to create Time’s The Page. I can’t be sure Halperin isn’t still using it, at least until Time introduces The Search.

In any case, these insidery nicknames are innocuous enough if a little annoying. As if the Beltway and Valley cultures aren’t insular enough, apparently we also have to give the elites of this elite an arbitrary fixed number to serve as a nickname.

As we’re all well aware, it’s said that DC is Hollywood for ugly people. But maybe this is wrong. Equating the District with LA is a bit presumptuous on our part. It might be more accurate to say that New York City is Hollywood for busy people. Or that Hollywood is New York for flaky people.

We shouldn’t pretend the Beltway is in their league. No, the Valley is our proper analogue. Heck, even Northern Virginia has its share of high tech companies. But then, they’ve got an Apple and a Google and a Cisco and we’ve got… AOL, which is relocating to NYC in hopes of turning itself around. I guess that means the Valley is DC for people who are good at math. Which I suppose means DC is the Valley for poor people. So, maybe our 500 doesn’t beat your 250 after all.

More Obama-Related Plagiarism?

I can’t keep up with all the plagiarism-related allegations against the Obama campaign, but I did notice the headline on this story by John Dickerson, currently on the front page of Slate…

Slate Plagiarizes NBC?

…bears unmistakable similarities to this recent clip by NBC’s Andrea Mitchell…

Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC

…from a week ago Tuesday night. Which leads me to ask… well, nothing really. However, when it comes to the charges against Barack Obama, I am inclined to agree with James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal. As he wrote yesterday,

isn’t it a bit heavy-handed to accuse Obama of plagiarism? This is a serious charge in academia and journalism, professions in which words are the final product. By contrast, language is a mere instrument for politicians. They hire speechwriters to put words in their mouths, something that would also be frowned upon in academia and journalism. Are voters really going to be dissuaded from backing Obama because as a politician he failed to adhere to the ethical standards that would have applied if he were a professor or a reporter? Not likely.

P.S. It’s fair to note, it isn’t Dickerson I am elbowing here — it’s Slate headline writers, who are notorious more for being misleading than for being copycats.

P.P.S. For what it’s worth, I see Crooks and Liars commenter lokmon beat me to the punch.

Return of the Smoke-Filled Back Room

My colleague Brian Devine, a good Democrat even though he once sported a Fred Thompson sticker on his car (next to one for Mark Warner), is not enthusiastic about where the fight for his party’s nomination is headed:

The point of all this is that since the primary is so close, one of these two groups composed of the Democratic leadership — the superdelegates or the credentials committee — will be the body that decides who will become the Democratic Party’s 2008 presidential nominee. And not the voters. Prior to today, I believed that the largest flaw in our electoral system was the leapfrogging of states for earlier primary dates. But now it is clear that I was wrong. The Democratic Party can’t get much more undemocratic than not letting the people decide.

There’s more to it than that, and if you’re unfamiliar with the situation he quotes enough to give you the full background.

Meantime, I’m left more than a little amused that the Republican Party nomination process — which features no superdelegates and dealt with its state parties’ “earliest” one-upsmanship in a less extreme manner — is actually more democratic than that of the Democratic Party.