<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog P.I. &#187; Message Boards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogpi.net/category/message-boards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogpi.net</link>
	<description>Putting the blogosphere under a magnifying glass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bloggingheads.tv: The Modern AIG</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/bloggingheadstv-the-modern-aig</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogpi.net/bloggingheadstv-the-modern-aig#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Beutler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[9/11 Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloggingheads.tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Message Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metapost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House '08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Beutler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I didn&#8217;t plan to disappear from blogging for a week, but sometimes that happens. Not that I was entirely absent from the blogosphere last week: among other activities related to blogging, I recorded my latest segment for Bloggingheads, this time not with Bill Scher but with Sara Robinson of Orcinus. Watch the whole thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I didn&#8217;t <em>plan</em> to disappear from blogging for a week, but sometimes that happens. Not that I was entirely absent from the blogosphere last week: among other activities related to blogging, I recorded <a href="http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/14520">my latest segment for Bloggingheads</a>, this time not with Bill Scher but with Sara Robinson of <a href="http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/">Orcinus</a>. Watch the whole thing here:</p>
<p><center><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.bloggingheads.tv/maulik/offsite/offsite_flvplayer.swf" flashvars="file=http%3A%2F%2Fbloggingheads%2Etv%2Fdiavlogs%2Fliveplayer%2Dplaylist%2F14520%3Fin%3D00%3A00%26out%3D47%3A49" height="288" width="380"></embed></center></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit, I think this was my weakest appearance. Our discussion leaned heavily toward economic systems and policy, which admittedly has not been a focus of my reading ever since, well, about the time I moved to the District. Funny, that. However, the <a href="http://bloggingheads.tv/forum/showthread.php?t=2128">Bheads forum regulars</a> yet again seem not to hate me and even sort of have my back, for which I am grateful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogpi.net/bloggingheadstv-the-modern-aig/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CNN/Something Awful Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.blogpi.net/the-cnnsomething-awful-debate</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogpi.net/the-cnnsomething-awful-debate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Beutler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asymmetrical Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Message Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seriously]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Gravel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogpi.net/the-cnnsomething-awful-debate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inspired by the recent CNN/YouTube debate, today&#8217;s New York Times asked several media observers to imagine other ways in which the Web 2.0 world might influence presidential politics. I found Matt Bai&#8217;s suggestion particularly interesting:
Maybe someday soon the candidates will have laptop computers at their lecterns, and we’ll hang a giant screen behind the stage. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspired by the recent CNN/YouTube debate, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/17/opinion/17newmediadebate.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin">today&#8217;s New York Times asked</a> several media observers to imagine other ways in which the Web 2.0 world might influence presidential politics. I found <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/17/opinion/17bai.html">Matt Bai&#8217;s suggestion</a> particularly interesting:</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe someday soon the candidates will have laptop computers at their lecterns, and we’ll hang a giant screen behind the stage. Then, as one candidate is talking, the others will use instant messaging to create a kind of scrolling commentary and critique, and all the comments will appear overhead.</p>
<p>While John Edwards is decrying special interests, Bill Richardson might type: “Gee, John, what exactly would you call the trial lawyers?” Or Christopher Dodd might write: “Why is Kucinich still talking? LOL.”</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a neat idea. This year&#8217;s Personal Democracy Forum tried something similar, with audience members&#8217; comments appearing on a screen behind the panelists. That worked all right, though it did distract from those onstage. </p>
<p>For a presidential debate then, the comments would indeed have to come from the candidates &#8212; not to mention, they need something to do while they wait five or ten minutes for their next turn. </p>
<p>And what if CNN teamed up with <a href="http://www.somethingawful.com/">uber-message board Something Awful</a>? Well, I believe it might look a little something like this:</p>
<p><center><img id="image692" src="http://www.blogpi.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/zomg-dem-debate.jpg" alt="Democratic Debate as co-sponsored by Something Awful" /></center></p>
<p><strong>P.S.</strong> I also noticed that the Times titled Tom Brokaw&#8217;s contribution <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/17/opinion/17brokaw.html">&#8220;Sip and Spin.&#8221;</a> Now, I&#8217;m perfectly fine with potential presidents answering questions from snowmen, but if you know whence the phrase come &#8212; <a href="http://www.inthe80s.com/toys/sitnspin.shtml">no, not the toy</a> &#8212; well, isn&#8217;t <em>that</em> a little undignified?</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> Something Awful has <a href="http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2603467">found this post</a>. Of course, they don&#8217;t seem to care for it and even rescinded the initial link. But the poster did concede:</p>
<blockquote><p>The picture is pretty much SA I guess.</p></blockquote>
<p>And as you can see in the comments, this post has been blessed with one of the most <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=die+in+a+fire">sincere statements</a> a latter-day message boarder can offer. Thanks, guys.</p>
<p><b>Updated again:</b> Okay, the people on <a href="http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2603126">this SA board</a> seemed to like it a bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogpi.net/the-cnnsomething-awful-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

